Avoiding the New Mediocre:The IMF,Doha and the New Multilateralism

Madame Christine Lagarde,Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund,addressed the Atlantic Council in Washington on 9 April.She spoke about the "new mediocre" she feels the global economy is falling into for reasons including aging populations and falling productivity growth.Reversing that decline in developed markets takes improving access to finances for SMEs,small and medium-sized enterprises,which represent most of the employment.The same applies to China.In Japan and the euro area,there are too many tax disincentives for them.
In too many countries,legal inequities still exist preventing access by women to the labour market.There are potentially huge global gains to be had by trade reform and integration.Completion of the Doha Round could give an economic boost of a trillion dollars.
The Doha Round is a series of trade negotiations among the World Trade Organization membership.It aims to achieve major reform of the international trading system through the introduction of lower trade barriers and revised international trade rules.The negotiations were named after the WTO's Fourth Ministerial Conference in Doha,Qatar,where they officially began in November 2001.The Doha Ministerial Declaration that came out of the Conference set forth the mandate for the negotiations,including on agriculture,services and an intellectual property topic,which had already begun.
The ministers at the Fourth Ministerial Conference also agreed on how to address the problems developing countries face when implementing the current WTO agreements.A fundamental objective of the Doha Round is to improve the trading prospects of developing countries.
How to dispel this new mediocre that is lurking on the horizon? We can only win by working together,Madame Lagarde insisted.The challenge for policy makers is to combine the policies that create growth with those that boost tomorrow's prospects.If countries strengthen their banks,it will reinforce the global financial system.If they implement climate-friendly policies,it will benefit their people and lower the global level of emissions.There is simply no alternative to the new multilateralism.The emerging markets and developing countries must have a seat at the table.Virtually our entire membership agrees,and they all await ratification by the United States Congress-if only to assert US leadership to a major institution for global financial stability,enhancing cooperation with new institutions in Asia and other places,the integration of dynamic emerging markets into the global economy through:
1.Financing for development.
2.New,sustainable development goals.
3.Addressing climate change.
They all interlink in many ways.How can we contribute on the IMF's three core deliverables?
1.Financing:we recently gave 390 million euros to the Ebola-affected countries from a catastrophe and containment relief trust that was set up.
2.Policy advice and analysis such as on domestic resource mobilisation;the role of inequality;energy subsidy reforms;carbon taxation-the time is right to price it right.
3.Technical assistance and training,such as our Massive Online Open Courses,which range from debt sustainability analysis to removing energy subsidies.Success will require a recommitment to international cooperation.In conclusion,Madame Lagarde quoted Winston Churchill,"I never worry about action;only inaction."

WTO Director Sees Progress

Pascal Lami,Director of the World Trade Organization,noted progress at the G8 summit in Italy last week:1.solid impetus,solid commitment to push back protectionist tendencies;2.commitment to finish the Doha round of negotiations;3.commitment to keep pushing on open trade,which is what developing nations need.As compared to last year,the U.S. and India have expressed the political will together.There remains a bit of compromising to be done,but their commitment to Doha 2010 is something new,Mr.Lami observed.
The G20 group of developed and key developing nations are to meet in Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania in September.The G8 summit may be considered to have been preparation for what many believe to be the more significant meeting.